collective.ots 0.1

Project Description
===================

The summary may not be perfect but it is a good starting point for a
description. Mostly the summary is pretty good though.
The description is only auto generated when you ADD a new Archetypes
content item WITHOUT a description. You may edit this description at any
time. You can invoke the summarizer on existing content items by
selecting 'Summarize' from the 'Actions' menu

Install using buildout
=======================

Just add collective.ots (and optionally ots) to the egges section of you buildout ::

eggs:
...
ots
collective.ots

Run buildout, restart your server and activate the product in your add ons section.
You do not have to use the ots egg (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ots)
if you have problems installing it. Any ots found in your system will do,
so you may install it with: ::

sudo apt-get install libots0

or the package manager of your distribution, or install it from source.

check that ots is installed and working with: ::

ots -?

which will give you the output: ::

Usage:
ots [OPTION...] [file.txt | stdin] - Open Text Summarizer

Help Options:
-?, --help Show help options

Application Options:
-r, --ratio=<int> summarization % [default = 20%]
-d, --dic=<string> dictionary to use
-o, --out=<string> output file [default = stdout]
-h, --html output as html
-k, --keywords only output keywords
-a, --about only output the summary
-v, --version show version information




- Code repository: https://svn.plone.org/svn/collective/collective.ots/
- Questions and comments to product-developers@lists.plone.org
- Report bugs at http://plone.org/products/collective.ots/issues


Change history
**************

Changelog
=========

0.1 (2011/02/22)
----------------
- added 'Summarize' view to 'Actions' menu
- Created recipe with ZopeSkel
["nan"]

Detailed Documentation
**********************

Introduction
============

This is a full-blown functional test. The emphasis here is on testing what
the user may input and see, and the system is largely tested as a black box.
We use PloneTestCase to set up this test as well, so we have a full Plone site
to play with. We *can* inspect the state of the portal, e.g. using
self.portal and self.folder, but it is often frowned upon since you are not
treating the system as a black box. Also, if you, for example, log in or set
roles using calls like self.setRoles(), these are not reflected in the test
browser, which runs as a separate session.

Being a doctest, we can tell a story here.

First, we must perform some setup. We use the testbrowser that is shipped
with Five, as this provides proper Zope 2 integration. Most of the
documentation, though, is in the underlying zope.testbrower package.

>>> from Products.Five.testbrowser import Browser
>>> browser = Browser()
>>> portal_url = self.portal.absolute_url()

The following is useful when writing and debugging testbrowser tests. It lets
us see all error messages in the error_log.

>>> self.portal.error_log._ignored_exceptions = ()

With that in place, we can go to the portal front page and log in. We will
do this using the default user from PloneTestCase:

>>> from Products.PloneTestCase.setup import portal_owner, default_password

Because add-on themes or products may remove or hide the login portlet, this test will use the login form that comes with plone.

>>> browser.open(portal_url + '/login_form')
>>> browser.getControl(name='__ac_name').value = portal_owner
>>> browser.getControl(name='__ac_password').value = default_password
>>> browser.getControl(name='submit').click()

Here, we set the value of the fields on the login form and then simulate a
submit click. We then ensure that we get the friendly logged-in message:

>>> "You are now logged in" in browser.contents
True

Finally, let's return to the front page of our site before continuing

>>> browser.open(portal_url)

-*- extra stuff goes here -*-


Contributors
************

"", Author


Download
********