friendly_brief 0.0.3

Brief number

We take the first unbroken group of digits as the brief number. For example, the following brief title starts with a “1”, then a “9”, and then a “.”.

19. Brief, BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND COMPARATIVE LAW SCHOLARS IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY, June 1, 2001, 2001 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 718

We stop upon noticing the non-digit “.” and use “19” as the brief number.

Posture

Posture is guessed based on the presence of certain phrases. There are five types of posture, and here are their corresponding phrases

Posture 0

“Neither party”

Posture 1

“Petitioner”, “Appellant”, and “Reversal”

Posture 2

“Respondent”, “Appellee”, “Affirmance”

Posture 3

“Plaintiff”

Posture 4

“Defendant”

The program looks for the presence of all of these phrases. If the result is unambiguous, the resulting spreadsheet contains the number corresponding to the posture.

Ambiguity can occur if no posture phrases are present or if phrases corresponding to different postures are present. For example, I would consider a brief title containing both “plaintiff” and “defendant” to be ambiguous. In cases of ambiguouity, the posture cell is left blank.

Amici

The messiest part of this whole process is the guessing of the amici. This process is designed to produce many false positives and, hopefully, no false negatives. That is, many non-amici will occur in the resulting spreadsheet, but no amici should be left out.

The brief title is split into pieces at commas and at the word “and”. Consider, for example, the following brief title.

4. Amicus Brief, BRIEF OF SOCIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGISTS AS AMICI CURIAE SUPPORTING RESPONDENTS, August 13, 2012, 2012 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 3223

It gets split into these pieces:

• 4. Amicus Brief

• BRIEF OF SOCIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGISTS AS AMICI CURIAE SUPPORTING RESPONDENTS

• August 13

• 2012

• 2012 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 3223

Next, the piece is expanded in both directions in case an amicus was erroneously broken. (That would happen if the name of the amicus contained a comma or the word “and”.) For the above example, the actual output is as follows, with the core amicus bolded and the expantion not bolded.

• 4. Amicus Brief, BRIEF OF SOCIAL AND

• 4. Amicus Brief, BRIEF OF SOCIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGISTS AS AMICI CURIAE SUPPORTING RESPONDENTS, August 13, 2012, 201

• ORTING RESPONDENTS, August 13, 2012, 2012 U.S. S. C

• ONDENTS, August 13, 2012, 2012 U.S. S. Ct. Bri

• S, August 13, 2012, 2012 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 3223

In the above example, the pieces are expanded by up 20 letters in each direction. In other cases, the expansion is smaller; here is how the size of the expansion is chosen.

1. We first check whether the brief title contains both a comma and the word “and”. In such cases, the expansion is 20 letters in each direction. The reasoning for this is that it is likely that an amicus’s name contains either a comma or the word “and” and that the amicus will thus get split erroneously; the large expansion is to avoid breaking the amicus’s name.

2. If the comma and “and” criterion was not met, we check for a phrase like “Inc.”. If it contains a phrase like “Inc.”, the expansion is five letters in each direction. Amici often have names like “Cogswell Cogs, Inc.”, and the intent of this rule is to include the “Inc.” in the name of the amicus.

3. If the above two criteria were not met, no expansion is used (zero letters).