Python wrapper around Lua and LuaJIT
Project description
Lupa
Lupa integrates the LuaJIT2 runtime into CPython. It is a partial rewrite of LunaticPython in Cython with some additional features such as proper coroutine support.
For questions not answered here, please contact the Lupa mailing list.
Major features
separate Lua runtime states through a LuaRuntime class
Python coroutine wrapper for Lua coroutines
iteration support for Python objects in Lua and Lua objects in Python
proper encoding and decoding of strings (configurable per runtime, UTF-8 by default)
frees the GIL and supports threading in separate runtimes when calling into Lua
tested with Python 2.6/3.2 and later
written for LuaJIT2 (tested with LuaJIT 2.0.2), but also works with the normal Lua interpreter (5.1 and 5.2)
easy to hack on and extend as it is written in Cython, not C
Why the name?
In Latin, “lupa” is a female wolf, as elegant and wild as it sounds. If you don’t like this kind of straight forward allegory to an endangered species, you may also happily assume it’s just an amalgamation of the phonetic sounds that start the words “Lua” and “Python”, two from each to keep the balance.
Why use it?
It complements Python very well. Lua is a language as dynamic as Python, but LuaJIT compiles it to very fast machine code, sometimes faster than many statically compiled languages for computational code. The language runtime is very small and carefully designed for embedding. The complete binary module of Lupa, including a statically linked LuaJIT2 runtime, only weighs some 700KB on a 64 bit machine. With standard Lua 5.1, it’s less than 400KB.
However, the Lua ecosystem lacks many of the batteries that Python readily includes, either directly in its standard library or as third party packages. This makes real-world Lua applications harder to write than equivalent Python applications. Lua is therefore not commonly used as primary language for large applications, but it makes for a fast, high-level and resource-friendly backup language inside of Python when raw speed is required and the edit-compile-run cycle of binary extension modules is too heavy and too static for agile development or hot-deployment.
Lupa is a very fast and thin wrapper around Lua or LuaJIT. It makes it easy to write dynamic Lua code that accompanies dynamic Python code by switching between the two languages at runtime, based on the tradeoff between simplicity and speed.
Examples
>>> import lupa >>> from lupa import LuaRuntime >>> lua = LuaRuntime(unpack_returned_tuples=True) >>> lua.eval('1+1') 2 >>> lua_func = lua.eval('function(f, n) return f(n) end') >>> def py_add1(n): return n+1 >>> lua_func(py_add1, 2) 3 >>> lua.eval('python.eval(" 2 ** 2 ")') == 4 True >>> lua.eval('python.builtins.str(4)') == '4' True
Note the flag unpack_returned_tuples=True that is passed to create the Lua runtime. It is new in Lupa 0.21 and changes the behaviour of tuples that get returned by Python functions. With this flag, they explode into separate Lua values:
>>> lua.execute('a,b,c = python.eval("(1,2)")') >>> g = lua.globals() >>> g.a 1 >>> g.b 2 >>> g.c is None True
When set to False, functions that return a tuple pass it through to the Lua code:
>>> non_explode_lua = lupa.LuaRuntime(unpack_returned_tuples=False) >>> non_explode_lua.execute('a,b,c = python.eval("(1,2)")') >>> g = non_explode_lua.globals() >>> g.a (1, 2) >>> g.b is None True >>> g.c is None True
Since the default behaviour (to not explode tuples) might change in a later version of Lupa, it is best to always pass this flag explicitly.
Python objects in Lua
Python objects are either converted when passed into Lua (e.g. numbers and strings) or passed as wrapped object references.
>>> lua_type = lua.globals().type # Lua's type() function >>> lua_type(1) == 'number' True >>> lua_type('abc') == 'string' True
Wrapped Lua objects get unwrapped when they are passed back into Lua, and arbitrary Python objects get wrapped in different ways:
>>> lua_type(lua_type) == 'function' # unwrapped Lua function True >>> lua_type(eval) == 'userdata' # wrapped Python function True >>> lua_type([]) == 'userdata' # wrapped Python object True
Lua supports two main protocols on objects: calling and indexing. It does not distinguish between attribute access and item access like Python does, so the Lua operations obj[x] and obj.x both map to indexing. To decide which Python protocol to use for Lua wrapped objects, Lupa employs a simple heuristic.
Pratically all Python objects allow attribute access, so if the object also has a __getitem__ method, it is preferred when turning it into an indexable Lua object. Otherwise, it becomes a simple object that uses attribute access for indexing from inside Lua.
Obviously, this heuristic will fail to provide the required behaviour in many cases, e.g. when attribute access is required to an object that happens to support item access. To be explicit about the protocol that should be used, Lupa provides the helper functions as_attrgetter() and as_itemgetter() that restrict the view on an object to a certain protocol, both from Python and from inside Lua:
>>> lua_func = lua.eval('function(obj) return obj["get"] end') >>> d = {'get' : 'value'} >>> value = lua_func(d) >>> value == d['get'] == 'value' True >>> value = lua_func( lupa.as_itemgetter(d) ) >>> value == d['get'] == 'value' True >>> dict_get = lua_func( lupa.as_attrgetter(d) ) >>> dict_get == d.get True >>> dict_get('get') == d.get('get') == 'value' True >>> lua_func = lua.eval( ... 'function(obj) return python.as_attrgetter(obj)["get"] end') >>> dict_get = lua_func(d) >>> dict_get('get') == d.get('get') == 'value' True
Note that unlike Lua function objects, callable Python objects support indexing in Lua:
>>> def py_func(): pass >>> py_func.ATTR = 2 >>> lua_func = lua.eval('function(obj) return obj.ATTR end') >>> lua_func(py_func) 2 >>> lua_func = lua.eval( ... 'function(obj) return python.as_attrgetter(obj).ATTR end') >>> lua_func(py_func) 2 >>> lua_func = lua.eval( ... 'function(obj) return python.as_attrgetter(obj)["ATTR"] end') >>> lua_func(py_func) 2
Iteration in Lua
Iteration over Python objects from Lua’s for-loop is fully supported. However, Python iterables need to be converted using one of the utility functions which are described here. This is similar to the functions like pairs() in Lua.
To iterate over a plain Python iterable, use the python.iter() function. For example, you can manually copy a Python list into a Lua table like this:
>>> lua_copy = lua.eval(''' ... function(L) ... local t, i = {}, 1 ... for item in python.iter(L) do ... t[i] = item ... i = i + 1 ... end ... return t ... end ... ''') >>> table = lua_copy([1,2,3,4]) >>> len(table) 4 >>> table[1] # Lua indexing 1
Python’s enumerate() function is also supported, so the above could be simplified to:
>>> lua_copy = lua.eval(''' ... function(L) ... local t = {} ... for index, item in python.enumerate(L) do ... t[ index+1 ] = item ... end ... return t ... end ... ''') >>> table = lua_copy([1,2,3,4]) >>> len(table) 4 >>> table[1] # Lua indexing 1
For iterators that return tuples, such as dict.iteritems(), it is convenient to use the special python.iterex() function that automatically explodes the tuple items into separate Lua arguments:
>>> lua_copy = lua.eval(''' ... function(d) ... local t = {} ... for key, value in python.iterex(d.items()) do ... t[key] = value ... end ... return t ... end ... ''') >>> d = dict(a=1, b=2, c=3) >>> table = lua_copy( lupa.as_attrgetter(d) ) >>> table['b'] 2
Note that accessing the d.items method from Lua requires passing the dict as attrgetter. Otherwise, attribute access in Lua would use the getitem protocol of Python dicts and look up d['items'] instead.
None vs. nil
While None in Python and nil in Lua differ in their semantics, they usually just mean the same thing: no value. Lupa therefore tries to map one directly to the other whenever possible:
>>> lua.eval('nil') is None True >>> is_nil = lua.eval('function(x) return x == nil end') >>> is_nil(None) True
The only place where this cannot work is during iteration, because Lua considers a nil value the termination marker of iterators. Therefore, Lupa special cases None values here and replaces them by a constant python.none instead of returning nil:
>>> _ = lua.require("table") >>> func = lua.eval(''' ... function(items) ... local t = {} ... for value in python.iter(items) do ... table.insert(t, value == python.none) ... end ... return t ... end ... ''') >>> items = [1, None ,2] >>> list(func(items).values()) [False, True, False]
Lupa avoids this value escaping whenever it’s obviously not necessary. Thus, when unpacking tuples during iteration, only the first value will be subject to python.none replacement, as Lua does not look at the other items for loop termination anymore. And on enumerate() iteration, the first value is known to be always a number and never None, so no replacement is needed.
>>> func = lua.eval(''' ... function(items) ... for a, b, c, d in python.iterex(items) do ... return {a == python.none, a == nil, --> a == python.none ... b == python.none, b == nil, --> b == nil ... c == python.none, c == nil, --> c == nil ... d == python.none, d == nil} --> d == nil ... ... end ... end ... ''') >>> items = [(None, None, None, None)] >>> list(func(items).values()) [True, False, False, True, False, True, False, True] >>> items = [(None, None)] # note: no values for c/d => nil in Lua >>> list(func(items).values()) [True, False, False, True, False, True, False, True]
Note that this behaviour changed in Lupa 1.0. Previously, the python.none replacement was done in more places, which made it not always very predictable.
Lua Tables
Lua tables mimic Python’s mapping protocol. For the special case of array tables, Lua automatically inserts integer indices as keys into the table. Therefore, indexing starts from 1 as in Lua instead of 0 as in Python. For the same reason, negative indexing does not work. It is best to think of Lua tables as mappings rather than arrays, even for plain array tables.
>>> table = lua.eval('{10,20,30,40}') >>> table[1] 10 >>> table[4] 40 >>> list(table) [1, 2, 3, 4] >>> list(table.values()) [10, 20, 30, 40] >>> len(table) 4 >>> mapping = lua.eval('{ [1] = -1 }') >>> list(mapping) [1] >>> mapping = lua.eval('{ [20] = -20; [3] = -3 }') >>> mapping[20] -20 >>> mapping[3] -3 >>> sorted(mapping.values()) [-20, -3] >>> sorted(mapping.items()) [(3, -3), (20, -20)] >>> mapping[-3] = 3 # -3 used as key, not index! >>> mapping[-3] 3 >>> sorted(mapping) [-3, 3, 20] >>> sorted(mapping.items()) [(-3, 3), (3, -3), (20, -20)]
A lookup of nonexisting keys or indices returns None (actually nil inside of Lua). A lookup is therefore more similar to the .get() method of Python dicts than to a mapping lookup in Python.
>>> table[1000000] is None True >>> table['no such key'] is None True >>> mapping['no such key'] is None True
Note that len() does the right thing for array tables but does not work on mappings:
>>> len(table) 4 >>> len(mapping) 0
This is because len() is based on the # (length) operator in Lua and because of the way Lua defines the length of a table. Remember that unset table indices always return nil, including indices outside of the table size. Thus, Lua basically looks for an index that returns nil and returns the index before that. This works well for array tables that do not contain nil values, gives barely predictable results for tables with ‘holes’ and does not work at all for mapping tables. For tables with both sequential and mapping content, this ignores the mapping part completely.
Note that it is best not to rely on the behaviour of len() for mappings. It might change in a later version of Lupa.
Similar to the table interface provided by Lua, Lupa also supports attribute access to table members:
>>> table = lua.eval('{ a=1, b=2 }') >>> table.a, table.b (1, 2) >>> table.a == table['a'] True
This enables access to Lua ‘methods’ that are associated with a table, as used by the standard library modules:
>>> string = lua.eval('string') # get the 'string' library table >>> print( string.lower('A') ) a
Lua Coroutines
The next is an example of Lua coroutines. A wrapped Lua coroutine behaves exactly like a Python coroutine. It needs to get created at the beginning, either by using the .coroutine() method of a function or by creating it in Lua code. Then, values can be sent into it using the .send() method or it can be iterated over. Note that the .throw() method is not supported, though.
>>> lua_code = '''\ ... function(N) ... for i=0,N do ... coroutine.yield( i%2 ) ... end ... end ... ''' >>> lua = LuaRuntime() >>> f = lua.eval(lua_code) >>> gen = f.coroutine(4) >>> list(enumerate(gen)) [(0, 0), (1, 1), (2, 0), (3, 1), (4, 0)]
An example where values are passed into the coroutine using its .send() method:
>>> lua_code = '''\ ... function() ... local t,i = {},0 ... local value = coroutine.yield() ... while value do ... t[i] = value ... i = i + 1 ... value = coroutine.yield() ... end ... return t ... end ... ''' >>> f = lua.eval(lua_code) >>> co = f.coroutine() # create coroutine >>> co.send(None) # start coroutine (stops at first yield) >>> for i in range(3): ... co.send(i*2) >>> mapping = co.send(None) # loop termination signal >>> sorted(mapping.items()) [(0, 0), (1, 2), (2, 4)]
It also works to create coroutines in Lua and to pass them back into Python space:
>>> lua_code = '''\ ... function f(N) ... for i=0,N do ... coroutine.yield( i%2 ) ... end ... end ; ... co1 = coroutine.create(f) ; ... co2 = coroutine.create(f) ; ... ... status, first_result = coroutine.resume(co2, 2) ; -- starting! ... ... return f, co1, co2, status, first_result ... ''' >>> lua = LuaRuntime() >>> f, co, lua_gen, status, first_result = lua.execute(lua_code) >>> # a running coroutine: >>> status True >>> first_result 0 >>> list(lua_gen) [1, 0] >>> list(lua_gen) [] >>> # an uninitialised coroutine: >>> gen = co(4) >>> list(enumerate(gen)) [(0, 0), (1, 1), (2, 0), (3, 1), (4, 0)] >>> gen = co(2) >>> list(enumerate(gen)) [(0, 0), (1, 1), (2, 0)] >>> # a plain function: >>> gen = f.coroutine(4) >>> list(enumerate(gen)) [(0, 0), (1, 1), (2, 0), (3, 1), (4, 0)]
Threading
The following example calculates a mandelbrot image in parallel threads and displays the result in PIL. It is based on a benchmark implementation for the Computer Language Benchmarks Game.
lua_code = '''\ function(N, i, total) local char, unpack = string.char, unpack local result = "" local M, ba, bb, buf = 2/N, 2^(N%8+1)-1, 2^(8-N%8), {} local start_line, end_line = N/total * (i-1), N/total * i - 1 for y=start_line,end_line do local Ci, b, p = y*M-1, 1, 0 for x=0,N-1 do local Cr = x*M-1.5 local Zr, Zi, Zrq, Ziq = Cr, Ci, Cr*Cr, Ci*Ci b = b + b for i=1,49 do Zi = Zr*Zi*2 + Ci Zr = Zrq-Ziq + Cr Ziq = Zi*Zi Zrq = Zr*Zr if Zrq+Ziq > 4.0 then b = b + 1; break; end end if b >= 256 then p = p + 1; buf[p] = 511 - b; b = 1; end end if b ~= 1 then p = p + 1; buf[p] = (ba-b)*bb; end result = result .. char(unpack(buf, 1, p)) end return result end ''' image_size = 1280 # == 1280 x 1280 thread_count = 8 from lupa import LuaRuntime lua_funcs = [ LuaRuntime(encoding=None).eval(lua_code) for _ in range(thread_count) ] results = [None] * thread_count def mandelbrot(i, lua_func): results[i] = lua_func(image_size, i+1, thread_count) import threading threads = [ threading.Thread(target=mandelbrot, args=(i,lua_func)) for i, lua_func in enumerate(lua_funcs) ] for thread in threads: thread.start() for thread in threads: thread.join() result_buffer = b''.join(results) # use PIL to display the image import Image image = Image.fromstring('1', (image_size, image_size), result_buffer) image.show()
Note how the example creates a separate LuaRuntime for each thread to enable parallel execution. Each LuaRuntime is protected by a global lock that prevents concurrent access to it. The low memory footprint of Lua makes it reasonable to use multiple runtimes, but this setup also means that values cannot easily be exchanged between threads inside of Lua. They must either get copied through Python space (passing table references will not work, either) or use some Lua mechanism for explicit communication, such as a pipe or some kind of shared memory setup.
Restricting Lua access to Python objects
Lupa provides a simple mechanism to control access to Python objects. Each attribute access can be passed through a filter function as follows:
>>> def filter_attribute_access(obj, attr_name, is_setting): ... if isinstance(attr_name, unicode): ... if not attr_name.startswith('_'): ... return attr_name ... raise AttributeError('access denied') >>> lua = lupa.LuaRuntime( ... register_eval=False, ... attribute_filter=filter_attribute_access) >>> func = lua.eval('function(x) return x.__class__ end') >>> func(lua) Traceback (most recent call last): ... AttributeError: access denied
The is_setting flag indicates whether the attribute is being read or set.
Note that the attributes of Python functions provide access to the current globals() and therefore to the builtins etc. If you want to safely restrict access to a known set of Python objects, it is best to work with a whitelist of safe attribute names. One way to do that could be to use a well selected list of dedicated API objects that you provide to Lua code, and to only allow Python attribute access to the set of public attribute/method names of these objects.
Since Lupa 0.22, you can alternatively provide dedicated getter and setter function implementations for a LuaRuntime:
>>> def getter(obj, attr_name): ... if attr_name == 'yes': ... return getattr(obj, attr_name) ... raise AttributeError( ... 'not allowed to read attribute "%s"' % attr_name) >>> def setter(obj, attr_name, value): ... if attr_name == 'put': ... setattr(obj, attr_name, value) ... return ... raise AttributeError( ... 'not allowed to write attribute "%s"' % attr_name) >>> class X(object): ... yes = 123 ... put = 'abc' ... noway = 2.1 >>> x = X() >>> lua = lupa.LuaRuntime(attribute_handlers=(getter, setter)) >>> func = lua.eval('function(x) return x.yes end') >>> func(x) # getting 'yes' 123 >>> func = lua.eval('function(x) x.put = "ABC"; end') >>> func(x) # setting 'put' >>> print(x.put) ABC >>> func = lua.eval('function(x) x.noway = 42; end') >>> func(x) # setting 'noway' Traceback (most recent call last): ... AttributeError: not allowed to write attribute "noway"
Importing Lua binary modules
This will usually work as is, but here are the details, in case anything goes wrong for you.
To use binary modules in Lua, you need to compile them against the header files of the LuaJIT sources that you used to build Lupa, but do not link them against the LuaJIT library.
Furthermore, CPython needs to enable global symbol visibility for shared libraries before loading the Lupa module. This can be done by calling sys.setdlopenflags(flag_values). Importing the lupa module will automatically try to set up the correct dlopen flags if it can find the platform specific DLFCN Python module that defines the necessary flag constants. In that case, using binary modules in Lua should work out of the box.
If this setup fails, however, you have to set the flags manually. When using the above configuration call, the argument flag_values must represent the sum of your system’s values for RTLD_NEW and RTLD_GLOBAL. If RTLD_NEW is 2 and RTLD_GLOBAL is 256, you need to call sys.setdlopenflags(258).
Assuming that the Lua luaposix (posix) module is available, the following should work on a Linux system:
>>> import sys >>> orig_dlflags = sys.getdlopenflags() >>> sys.setdlopenflags(258) >>> import lupa >>> sys.setdlopenflags(orig_dlflags) >>> lua = lupa.LuaRuntime() >>> posix_module = lua.require('posix') # doctest: +SKIP
Installing lupa
Building with LuaJIT2
Download and unpack lupa
Download LuaJIT2
Unpack the archive into the lupa base directory, e.g.:
.../lupa-0.1/LuaJIT-2.0.2
Build LuaJIT:
cd LuaJIT-2.0.2 make cd ..
If you need specific C compiler flags, pass them to make as follows:
make CFLAGS="..."
For trickier target platforms like Windows and MacOS-X, please see the official installation instructions for LuaJIT.
NOTE: When building on Windows, make sure that lua51.lib is made in addition to lua51.dll. The MSVC build produces this file, MinGW does NOT.
Build lupa:
python setup.py install
Or any other distutils target of your choice, such as build or one of the bdist targets. See the distutils documentation for help, also the hints on building extension modules.
Note that on 64bit MacOS-X installations, the following additional compiler flags are reportedly required due to the embedded LuaJIT:
-pagezero_size 10000 -image_base 100000000
You can find additional installation hints for MacOS-X in this somewhat unclear blog post, which may or may not tell you at which point in the installation process to provide these flags.
Also, on 64bit MacOS-X, you will typically have to set the environment variable ARCHFLAGS to make sure it only builds for your system instead of trying to generate a fat binary with both 32bit and 64bit support:
export ARCHFLAGS="-arch x86_64"
Note that this applies to both LuaJIT and Lupa, so make sure you try a clean build of everything if you forgot to set it initially.
Building with Lua 5.1
Reportedly, it also works to use Lupa with the standard (non-JIT) Lua runtime. To that end, install Lua 5.1 instead of LuaJIT2, including any development packages (header files etc.).
On systems that use the “pkg-config” configuration mechanism, Lupa’s setup.py will pick up either LuaJIT2 or Lua automatically, with a preference for LuaJIT2 if it is found. Pass the --no-luajit option to the setup.py script if you have both installed but do not want to use LuaJIT2.
On other systems, you may have to supply the build parameters externally, e.g. using environment variables or by changing the setup.py script manually. Pass the --no-luajit option to the setup.py script in order to ignore the failure you get when neither LuaJIT2 nor Lua are found automatically.
For further information, read this mailing list post:
Lupa change log
1.0b1 (2014-09-14)
NOTE: this release includes the major backwards incompatible changes listed below. It is believed that they simplify the interaction between Python code and Lua code by more strongly following idiomatic Lua on the Lua side.
Instead of passing a wrapped python.none object into Lua, None return values are now mapped to nil, making them more straight forward to handle in Lua code. This makes the behaviour more consistent, as it was previously somewhat arbitrary where python.none could appear and where a nil value was used. The only remaining exception is during iteration, where the first returned value must not be nil in Lua, or otherwise the loop terminates prematurely. To prevent this, any None value that the iterator returns, or any first item in exploded tuples that is None, is still mapped to python.none. Any further values returned in the same iteration will be mapped to nil if they are None, not to python.none. This means that only the first argument needs to be manually checked for this special case. For the enumerate() iterator, the counter is never None and thus the following unpacked items will never be mapped to python.none.
When unpack_returned_tuples=True, iteration now also unpacks tuple values, including enumerate() iteration, which yields a flat sequence of counter and unpacked values.
When calling bound Python methods from Lua as “obj:meth()”, Lupa now prevents Python from prepending the self argument a second time, so that the Python method is now called as “obj.meth()”. Previously, it was called as “obj.meth(obj)”. Note that this can be undesired when the object itself is explicitly passed as first argument from Lua, e.g. when calling “func(obj)” where “func” is “obj.meth”, but these constellations should be rare. As a work-around for this case, user code can wrap the bound method in another function so that the final call comes from Python.
garbage collection works for reference cycles that span both runtimes, Python and Lua
calling from Python into Lua and back into Python did not clean up the Lua call arguments before the innermost call, so that they could leak into the nested Python call or its return arguments
support for Lua 5.2 (in addition to Lua 5.1 and LuaJIT 2.0)
Lua tables support Python’s “del” statement for item deletion (patch by Jason Fried)
Attribute lookup can use a more fine-grained control mechanism by implementing explicit getter and setter functions for a LuaRuntime (attribute_handlers argument). Patch by Brian Moe.
item assignments/lookups on Lua objects from Python no longer special case double underscore names (as opposed to attribute lookups)
0.21 (2014-02-12)
some garbage collection issues were cleaned up using new Cython features
new LuaRuntime option unpack_returned_tuples which automatically unpacks tuples returned from Python functions into separate Lua objects (instead of returning a single Python tuple object)
some internal wrapper classes were removed from the module API
Windows build fixes
Py3.x build fixes
support for building with Lua 5.1 instead of LuaJIT (setup.py –no-luajit)
no longer uses Cython by default when building from released sources (pass --with-cython to explicitly request a rebuild)
requires Cython 0.20+ when building from unreleased sources
built with Cython 0.20.1
0.20 (2011-05-22)
fix “deallocating None” crash while iterating over Lua tables in Python code
support for filtering attribute access to Python objects for Lua code
fix: setting source encoding for Lua code was broken
0.19 (2011-03-06)
fix serious resource leak when creating multiple LuaRuntime instances
portability fix for binary module importing
0.18 (2010-11-06)
fix iteration by returning Py_None object for None instead of nil, which would terminate the iteration
when converting Python values to Lua, represent None as a Py_None object in places where nil has a special meaning, but leave it as nil where it doesn’t hurt
support for counter start value in python.enumerate()
native implementation for python.enumerate() that is several times faster
much faster Lua iteration over Python objects
0.17 (2010-11-05)
new helper function python.enumerate() in Lua that returns a Lua iterator for a Python object and adds the 0-based index to each item.
new helper function python.iterex() in Lua that returns a Lua iterator for a Python object and unpacks any tuples that the iterator yields.
new helper function python.iter() in Lua that returns a Lua iterator for a Python object.
reestablished the python.as_function() helper function for Lua code as it can be needed in cases where Lua cannot determine how to run a Python function.
0.16 (2010-09-03)
dropped python.as_function() helper function for Lua as all Python objects are callable from Lua now (potentially raising a TypeError at call time if they are not callable)
fix regression in 0.13 and later where ordinary Lua functions failed to print due to an accidentally used meta table
fix crash when calling str() on wrapped Lua objects without metatable
0.15 (2010-09-02)
support for loading binary Lua modules on systems that support it
0.14 (2010-08-31)
relicensed to the MIT license used by LuaJIT2 to simplify licensing considerations
0.13.1 (2010-08-30)
fix Cython generated C file using Cython 0.13
0.13 (2010-08-29)
fixed undefined behaviour on str(lua_object) when the object’s __tostring() meta method fails
removed redundant “error:” prefix from LuaError messages
access to Python’s python.builtins from Lua code
more generic wrapping rules for Python objects based on supported protocols (callable, getitem, getattr)
new helper functions as_attrgetter() and as_itemgetter() to specify the Python object protocol used by Lua indexing when wrapping Python objects in Python code
new helper functions python.as_attrgetter(), python.as_itemgetter() and python.as_function() to specify the Python object protocol used by Lua indexing of Python objects in Lua code
item and attribute access for Python objects from Lua code
0.12 (2010-08-16)
fix Lua stack leak during table iteration
fix lost Lua object reference after iteration
0.11 (2010-08-07)
error reporting on Lua syntax errors failed to clean up the stack so that errors could leak into the next Lua run
Lua error messages were not properly decoded
0.10 (2010-07-27)
much faster locking of the LuaRuntime, especially in the single threaded case (see http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577336-fast-re-entrant-optimistic-lock-implemented-in-cyt/)
fixed several error handling problems when executing Python code inside of Lua
0.9 (2010-07-23)
fixed Python special double-underscore method access on LuaObject instances
Lua coroutine support through dedicated wrapper classes, including Python iteration support. In Python space, Lua coroutines behave exactly like Python generators.
0.8 (2010-07-21)
support for returning multiple values from Lua evaluation
repr() support for Lua objects
LuaRuntime.table() method for creating Lua tables from Python space
encoding fix for str(LuaObject)
0.7 (2010-07-18)
LuaRuntime.require() and LuaRuntime.globals() methods
renamed LuaRuntime.run() to LuaRuntime.execute()
support for len(), setattr() and subscripting of Lua objects
provide all built-in Lua libraries in LuaRuntime, including support for library loading
fixed a thread locking issue
fix passing Lua objects back into the runtime from Python space
0.6 (2010-07-18)
Python iteration support for Lua objects (e.g. tables)
threading fixes
fix compile warnings
0.5 (2010-07-14)
explicit encoding options per LuaRuntime instance to decode/encode strings and Lua code
0.4 (2010-07-14)
attribute read access on Lua objects, e.g. to read Lua table values from Python
str() on Lua objects
include .hg repository in source downloads
added missing files to source distribution
0.3 (2010-07-13)
fix several threading issues
safely free the GIL when calling into Lua
0.2 (2010-07-13)
propagate Python exceptions through Lua calls
0.1 (2010-07-12)
first public release
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.