A lil' TOML parser
Project description
Tomli
A lil' TOML parser
Table of Contents generated with mdformat-toc
Intro
Tomli is a Python library for parsing TOML. Tomli is fully compatible with TOML v1.0.0.
Installation
pip install tomli
Usage
Parse a TOML string
import tomli
toml_str = """
gretzky = 99
[kurri]
jari = 17
"""
toml_dict = tomli.loads(toml_str)
assert toml_dict == {"gretzky": 99, "kurri": {"jari": 17}}
Parse a TOML file
import tomli
with open("path_to_file/conf.toml", encoding="utf-8") as f:
toml_dict = tomli.load(f)
Handle invalid TOML
import tomli
try:
toml_dict = tomli.loads("]] this is invalid TOML [[")
except tomli.TOMLDecodeError:
print("Yep, definitely not valid.")
Construct decimal.Decimal
s from TOML floats
from decimal import Decimal
import tomli
toml_dict = tomli.loads("precision-matters = 0.982492", parse_float=Decimal)
assert isinstance(toml_dict["precision-matters"], Decimal)
FAQ
Why this parser?
- it's lil'
- pure Python with zero dependencies
- as fast as pure Python allows
- 100% spec compliance: passes all tests in a test set soon to be merged to the official compliance tests for TOML repository
- 100% test coverage
Is comment preserving round-trip parsing supported?
No.
The tomli.loads
function returns a plain dict
that is populated with builtin types and types from the standard library only.
Preserving comments requires a custom type to be returned so will not be supported,
at least not by the tomli.loads
function.
Is there a dumps
, write
or encode
function?
Not yet, and it's possible there never will be. This library is deliberately minimal, and most TOML use cases are read-only. Also, most use cases where writes are relevant could also benefit from comment and whitespace preserving reads, which this library does not currently support.
How do TOML types map into Python types?
TOML type | Python type |
---|---|
Document root | dict |
String | str |
Integer | int |
Float | float |
Boolean | bool |
Offset Date-Time | datetime.datetime |
Local Date-Time | datetime.datetime |
Local Date | datetime.date |
Local Time | datetime.time |
Array | list |
Inline Table | dict |
Performance
The benchmark/
folder in this repository contains a performance benchmark for comparing the various Python TOML parsers.
The benchmark can be run with tox -e benchmark-pypi
.
On May 29 2021 running the benchmark output the following on my notebook computer.
foo@bar:~/dev/tomli$ tox -e benchmark-pypi
benchmark-pypi installed: attrs==19.3.0,click==7.1.2,pytomlpp==1.0.2,qtoml==0.3.0,rtoml==0.6.1,toml==0.10.2,tomli==0.2.3,tomlkit==0.7.2
benchmark-pypi run-test-pre: PYTHONHASHSEED='2295586404'
benchmark-pypi run-test: commands[0] | python benchmark/run.py
Parsing data.toml 5000 times:
------------------------------------------------------
parser | exec time | performance (more is better)
-----------+------------+-----------------------------
pytomlpp | 1.14 s | baseline (100%)
rtoml | 1.16 s | 98.13%
tomli | 7.58 s | 15.07%
toml | 9.35 s | 12.21%
qtoml | 15.4 s | 7.43%
tomlkit | 68.3 s | 1.67%
The parsers are ordered from fastest to slowest, using the fastest parser (pytomlpp) as baseline. Tomli performed the best out of all pure Python TOML parsers, losing only to pytomlpp (wraps C++) and rtoml (wraps Rust).
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.