trepan 0.4.2

Command Completion

Starting with release 2.8, readline command completion has been added. Command completion is not just a simple static list, but varies depending on the context. For example, for frame-changing commands which take optional numbers, on the list of valid numbers is considered.

Smart Eval

Starting with release 0.2.0, if you want to evaluate the current source line before it is run in the code, use eval. To evaluate text of a common fragment of line, such as the expression part of an if statement, you can do that with eval?. See the help for eval for more information.

More Stepping Control

Sometimes you want small steps, and sometimes large stepping.

This fundamental issue is handled in a couple ways:

Event Tracing of Calls and Returns

I’m not sure why this was not done before. Probably because of the lack of the ability to set and move by different granularities, tracing calls and returns lead to too many uninteresting stops (such as at the same place you just were at). Also, stopping on function definitions probably also added to this tedium.

Because we’re really handling return events, we can show you the return value. (pdb has an “undocumented” retval command that doesn’t seem to work.)

Debugger Macros via Python Lambda expressions

Starting with release 0.2.3, there are debugger macros. In gdb, there is a macro debugger command to extend debugger commands.

However Python has its own rich programming language so it seems silly to recreate the macro language that is in gdb. Simpler and more powerful is just to use Python here. A debugger macro here is just a lambda expression which returns a string or a list of strings. Each string returned should be a debugger command.

We also have aliases for the extremely simple situation where you want to give an alias to an existing debugger command. But beware: some commands, like step inspect command suffixes and change their behavior accordingly.

We also envision a number of other ways to allow extension of this debugger either through additional modules, or user-supplied debugger command directories.

If what you were looking for in macros was more front-end control over the debugger, then consider using the experimental (and not finished) Bullwinkle protocol.

Byte-code Instruction Introspection

We do more in the way of looking at the byte codes to give better information. Through this we can provide:

• a skip command. It is like the jump command, but you don’t have to deal with line numbers.

• disassembly of code fragments. You can now disassemble relative to the stack frames you are currently stopped at.

• Better interpretation of where you are when inside execfile or exec. (But really though this is probably a Python compiler misfeature.)

• Check that breakpoints are set only where they make sense.

• A more accurate determination of if you are at a function-defining def statement (because the caller instruction contains MAKE_FUNCTION.)

Source-code Syntax Colorization

Starting with release 0.2.0, terminal source code is colorized via pygments and we make use of terminal bold and emphasized text in debugger output and help text. Of course, you can also turn this off.

Debugger Command Arguments can be Variables and Expressions

Commands that take integer arguments like up, list or disassemble allow you to use a Python expression which may include local or global variables that evaluates to an integer. This eliminates the need in gdb for special “dollar” debugger variables. (Note however because of shlex parsing ,expressions can’t have embedded blanks.)

Out-of-Process Debugging

You can now debug your program in a different process or even a different computer on a different network!

Modularity

The Debugger plays nice with other trace hooks. You can have several debugger objects.

Many of the things listed below doesn’t directly effect end-users, but it does eventually by way of more robust and featureful code. And keeping developers happy is a good thing.(TM)

• Commands and subcommands are individual classes now, not methods in a class. This means they now have properties like the context in which they can be run, minimum abbreviation name or alias names. To add a new command you basically add a file in a directory.

• I/O is it’s own layer. This simplifies interactive readline behavior from reading commands over a TCP socket.

• An interface is it’s own layer. Local debugging, remote debugging, running debugger commands from a file (source) are different interfaces. This means, for example, that we are able to give better error reporting if a debugger command file has an error.

• There is an experimental Python-friendly interface for front-ends

• more testable. Much more unit and functional tests. More of pydb’s integration test will eventually be added.

Etc.

Of course, I think pydb has a number of cool things that are not in the stock Python debugger, pdb. See this for those features.